Episode 843 Talkback: Comic Talk Tony Harris rants, Flash 1, DrawerBox's Rich Vincent!
#1
Posted 10 May 2010 - 01:00 PM
Listen to the show:
http://www.comicgeekspeak.com/episodes/com..._speak-1077.php
#2
Posted 10 May 2010 - 04:04 PM
Speaking of books I enjoy. I read books that I enjoy. I like getting recommendations from people about books that I they think I would enjoy but the fact of the matter is I have a very small budget for comics. I have even less room in my two bedroom, two bathroom apartment and I have a wife who barely tolerates the stuff I have which is a fraction of what I had when I lived at my parent's house. I would love to be able to pick up all kinds of things but because of the above, I have to be fairly choosy about what I follow on a monthly basis. Because of this, I pretty much get DC books because I love DC. I love their history. I love their characters and I love the direction they are in. When I can, I get other things. I finally read the first volume of "Chew" and loved it. I also read the first volume of "Jersey G-ds" and really dug that but as much as those books interested me, I've been reading Green Lantern since I was five years old and it's consistently always been my favorite book. I don't mind going out of my comfort zone every now and again and trying something new but at the end of the day when comics cost what they do and the economy being what it is, I go with what I know and I know that I love.
#3
Posted 10 May 2010 - 05:01 PM
Matthew
I read in issues: Superman, Action Comics, Supergirl,Superman elseworlds mini, Batgirl, Sts. of Gotham, Adventure Comics, Legion, Power Girl, JLA, Wonder Woman, Zatanna, Fables, Amazing Spider-Man, FF, Hulk, Incredible Hulk, Uncanny X-Men, X-Men Forever 2, Walking Dead, Sweets mini, Hellboy, MouseGuard miniseries & Usagi Yojimbo.
Trades: Jonah Hex, Saga of the Swamp Thing HC, Walking Dead HC, Locke & Key, Hellboy/BPRD, Criminal & Astro City.
Have you read a comic today?
#4
Posted 10 May 2010 - 05:55 PM
#5
Posted 10 May 2010 - 08:48 PM
I think it's a little puzzling to argue for creator unionizing at the same time as creator-owned titles. Most creator-owned projects won't be released through places like Vertigo or Wildstorm. Most won't even come out through Image. If you're pushing creators to take a hard line on money and benefits, not many basement-run vanity presses can live up to those kinds of expectations.
#6
Posted 10 May 2010 - 09:57 PM
I feel that way, but I know that it's pointless and maybe stupid to argue with people's tastes. People like what they like. Getting upset about it is a waste of time.
All I know is that comics that are new to me are the comics that excite me most. Batman has been my favorite superhero since I was four, but I'm perfectly happy to skip his comics if they aren't doing something that I like. But I'll spend/waste lots of time trying to figure out which new OGNs or monthlies I can get each month. When I go to HeroesCon, I go to Indie Island first, and might stay there the whole time. It's not that I don't like the big publishers, but I just know that there are going to be very cool things in Indie Island that I've never seen before.
So yeah, I feel what Tony Harris is saying. And I think it's important to promote new concepts, or creator-owned comics, or whatever type of comics you're passionate about. But nobody has an obligation to buy a particular type of comic. Calling people out, while cathartic, isn't likely to work. But, if you have a couple extra bucks, or if something you're reading now isn't doing it for you anymore, try something new!
This post has been edited by blockhead: 10 May 2010 - 10:00 PM
#7
Posted 10 May 2010 - 10:07 PM
#8
Posted 10 May 2010 - 10:53 PM
It comes out this week? Awesome.
#9
Posted 10 May 2010 - 11:59 PM
Dug the hell out of that Flash ring, though. That was the first thing I opened out of the whole box and it stayed on my hand the rest of the night.
Facebook / Twitter / GoodReads / My Sketches
#10
Posted 11 May 2010 - 12:04 AM
It's quite a nice looking ring.
#11
Posted 11 May 2010 - 02:09 AM
#12
Posted 11 May 2010 - 03:44 AM
#13
Posted 11 May 2010 - 06:17 AM
Disagree. The story of my life is uniquely mine and mine alone.
Therefore if I put my personality and life experience into a piece of fiction, it is a unique story.
We could go on forever on this whole commercialize product vs. art. The people who like art think that the people who "digest" commercialized product are idiots and the other side think that the people who love the art are snobs.
This post has been edited by Devyn Rodriguez: 11 May 2010 - 06:20 AM
#14
Posted 11 May 2010 - 07:10 AM
Thank you!
I have 3 issues of that book and I have no intention of completeting the series.
#15
Posted 11 May 2010 - 07:22 AM
Therefore if I put my personality and life experience into a piece of fiction, it is a unique story.
We could go on forever on this whole commercialize product vs. art. The people who like art think that the people who "digest" commercialized product are idiots and the other side think that the people who love the art are snobs.
No, I agree with you. I think you can take Wolverine and tell the same story over and over again but every writer and artist team will have its own take on it. Thats why I think the whole argument is pointless. It is like getting mad about there being no new rock music, its all just three chords and the truth. I happen to like the way the White Stripes interpret Rock and Blues but I would never call them original. Look at Avatar, it is a completely alien world in the future with fantastic ideas and shown in a brand new format, but if you tried to call it an orginal story people with laugh. I agree that the "unique" presentation is what will keep art going until the end of time but I don't think there are really any truly "original" ideas anymore.
#16
Posted 11 May 2010 - 10:17 AM
chris
#17
Posted 11 May 2010 - 11:51 AM
Agreed. He's not making his argument by doing it the way he's doing it.
#18
Posted 11 May 2010 - 11:58 AM
chris
I have haven't had a chance to listen to the episode yet, your comment struck a chord that I have been strumming for a while in the ol' noggin. With the fantastic run of GL lately, does Johns as the creator get to "own" those characters he developed? Like Saint Walker, Larfleeze, the Emotional Entities, even the whole Rainbow Spectrum. If and how would Johns get compensated if other writers used his IP?

"The fewer lines you can put into a drawing the quicker it reads, and the simpler it is." - Jim Steranko
#19
Posted 11 May 2010 - 12:05 PM
That's an interesting question because when you look at it, Johns has created a few other characters as well like Ms. Martian who he named after the wife of a friend of his and then he created Courtney Whitmore who was created to honor his sister I believe. You also have all the Green Lantern characters like the different colored Corps characters like you mentioned. Larfleeze, Saint Walker and Atrocitus. It would be interesting to know if they own a piece of the character.
#20
Posted 11 May 2010 - 02:35 PM
All respect to Tony Harris, but when a creator starts complaining about what readers buy, when they complain that there aren't any new ideas out there because readers are still buying the same books they bought for years from the big two, it sounds like sour grapes to me. It sounds like: "Hey, why aren't you buying my book!? Buy my book! It's a new idea! The big two suck and you suck for buying their books!"
Nothing makes me not want to buy a book more then when the creator is telling me that I'm a sheep and that I buy crap.
Comics cost money . . . quite a bit, actually. Not all comic readers are made of money, so when they spend their $20, $30, $40, $50, $100, or whatever a month on books, you're damn right they want to buy something they feel comfortable with.
Tony, I don't tell you how to spend your money, don't tell us how to spend our money, especially when it feels less like you are trying to do something as lofty as saving the industry, and more like you just want us to buy your books.

Help





















