Secret Wars 2 Talkback
#2
Posted 04 December 2008 - 03:04 PM
I've written about the colour theory of superheroes/villains on my site before. A simple rule of thumb is primary colours = heroes. Secondary colours = villains. Particularly true for Silver Age Marvel & DC. It's also interesting to note the big names that break that rule tend to be "monstrous" heroes like The Thing and Hulk or ambiguous characters like Namor.
Re: 80s writing sexism.
I think it's more Jim Shooter than the era. Compared to what Stern was doing with She-Hulk, Wasp and Captain Marvel in Avengers, their portrayals in Secret Wars are appalling.
This post has been edited by Brack: 04 December 2008 - 03:23 PM
#4
Posted 04 December 2008 - 10:09 PM
#5
Posted 04 December 2008 - 11:27 PM
But re-reading it now, I'm struck by all the things he's doing here that comic writers today have problems with. The sense of scale. A large cast of clearly delineated characters. And a clear through-line that carries the story forward.
And permeating all this is a grand sense of fun.
There's also this "Marvel Comics Vibe" I get when reading this comic. I don't get that when reading Marvel Comics today. And I miss it.
#6
Posted 05 December 2008 - 07:13 AM
#7
Posted 05 December 2008 - 05:36 PM
I'm brand new to comics at age 42,
I've got my Watchmen trade so I'm ready for that one. That was a great comic, just didn't like the ending so much, I'd rather have justice and truth than world peace. Let man make decisions based on fact and not manipulation, and suffer the due consequences of his choices.
P.S. CGS and CCL are my favorite comic podcasts, and I've found many comics to check out through listening.
Bugz
#8
Posted 05 December 2008 - 07:18 PM
http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2...ds-revealed-90/
#9
Posted 05 December 2008 - 07:49 PM
http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2...ds-revealed-90/
Ha! That's a riot!
#10
Posted 05 December 2008 - 07:56 PM
I'm brand new to comics at age 42,
I've got my Watchmen trade so I'm ready for that one. That was a great comic, just didn't like the ending so much, I'd rather have justice and truth than world peace. Let man make decisions based on fact and not manipulation, and suffer the due consequences of his choices.
P.S. CGS and CCL are my favorite comic podcasts, and I've found many comics to check out through listening.
Bugz
Bugz! Thanks for writing! I'm really digging the new forum posters or the posters will lower post counts joining us for these discussions! Keep it up!
As to your question, right now Footnotes is focusing on four titles:
- Secret Wars 1-12
http://www.comicbookdb.com/title.php?ID=602
- Thor 337 through 350 (the end of the Surtur saga) or 367 (the last Walt Simonson as writer and artist issue)
http://www.comicbookdb.com/title.php?ID=1246
- Justice League/International (at least up to issue 24 - where it splits off into JLI/JLEurope)
http://www.comicbookdb.com/title.php?ID=1334
- JSA (the Robinson/Goyer/Johns run starting in 1999)
http://www.comicbookdb.com/title.php?ID=225
I'll make sure that at the end of each episode, we'll mention which issue the next issue will cover. Some might be interrupted by Annuals. If it crosses over into another title, we'll probably talk about 2 issues in one episode (unless it's a multiple part story like Black Reign where maybe we'll flip flop. We'll see).
Also, starting in mid-December we'll be doing a weekly issue by issue look at Watchmen.
Those five titles will keep us busy for a bit. The first to end will be Secret Wars - we'll decide at that time what other title we want to replace it with.
#11
Posted 05 December 2008 - 08:16 PM
As to your question, right now Footnotes is focusing on four titles:
- Secret Wars 1-12
http://www.comicbookdb.com/title.php?ID=602
- Thor 337 through 350 (the end of the Surtur saga) or 367 (the last Walt Simonson as writer and artist issue)
http://www.comicbookdb.com/title.php?ID=1246
- Justice League/International (at least up to issue 24 - where it splits off into JLI/JLEurope)
http://www.comicbookdb.com/title.php?ID=1334
- JSA (the Robinson/Goyer/Johns run starting in 1999)
http://www.comicbookdb.com/title.php?ID=225
I'll make sure that at the end of each episode, we'll mention which issue the next issue will cover. Some might be interrupted by Annuals. If it crosses over into another title, we'll probably talk about 2 issues in one episode (unless it's a multiple part story like Black Reign where maybe we'll flip flop. We'll see).
Also, starting in mid-December we'll be doing a weekly issue by issue look at Watchmen.
Those five titles will keep us busy for a bit. The first to end will be Secret Wars - we'll decide at that time what other title we want to replace it with.
I want to do the entire 120-issue run of Marvel's Groo! Come on team, we can do it. Each episode will be filled with cheese dip and mulch jokes.
Bry
#12
Posted 05 December 2008 - 09:52 PM
#13
Posted 06 December 2008 - 01:29 AM
Second I loved Mike Zeck's Cap run. Its one of THE defining Captain America runs and I would recommend it to any Cap fan who hasn't checked it out. Having said that, Secret Wars is not his best work by any means. It looked to me then (and does now as well) as very rushed; the work of a master craftsman given a too short a time to complete his task. There are a lot of characters to draw here, and it'd be a lot for any artist to deal with (except maybe Geo. Perez
I remember feeling burned/betrayed by Contest of Champions as, at the time it came out, even as a padawan geek;I felt cheated and then seeing Secret Wars on the racks and thinking "Here we go again..." By the time this came out i was reading Alan Moore's Swamp Thing, Perez and Wolfman's Teen Titans, Fleming and Von Eeden's Thriller and the Levitz/Giffen Legion and this just didn't seem to cut the proverbial mustard in my eyes at the time.( I just realized those were all DC books but I loved me some DD and FF as well...) I ended up reading it much later in trade at a friends insistence and was still nonplussed.
I am listening to the Footnotes show however as your particular take is nostalgic, entertaining and may actually force me to give this another chance. I was more intrigued at the time with the outcome of the event and the storylines that spun out of it (Spidey's new costume, She-Hulk in the FF, etc. ) and the ramifications than the actual event itself, and I guess I still am.
I actually got a kick out of the 90's Spider Man animated show's take on Secret Wars as it was much more streamlined as a story, didn't meander as much as the comic does, and had characters acting and speaking in character.
You may flame away oh Secret Wars fans; I'm a big dude, I can take it.
#14
Posted 06 December 2008 - 04:38 AM
Oh, and to address your point from the last episode, you are correct that there was no mention of Jim Rhodes accompanying that Secret Wars action figure... the deception was so complete that I didn't know who was in there until the day I listened to the episode. For decades, I have lived a lie!
#15
Posted 06 December 2008 - 01:56 PM
http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2...ds-revealed-90/
There's actually a reason for this. For a long time, it was felt that periods didn't "read." That they just looked like a printing error.
So exclamations marks, question marks, and ellipses were used almost exclusively.
As printing techniques improved, periods began to be used more frequently.
The lack of periods does give a breathless quality to the dialog in Silver and Bronze Age books.
#16
Posted 06 December 2008 - 02:16 PM
At least Shooter can write stories with a beginning, middle and end. A skill lacking in most contemporary comic writers.
And that's one of the reasons I see the writing of superhero comics today as having changed stylistically, rather than an improved.
I can enjoy each era for what it does best. But I see little progression. And we all know in twenty years people will be talking about "typical bad noughties writing."
#17
Posted 07 December 2008 - 08:17 PM
I agree that Zeck's art on this book wasn't his best. In fact, I think his work on Captain America (which was prior to this book was better). I don't know if it was the deadlines or what, but this wasn't his best work.
While the iconic versions of the characters were used, unfortunately during that time period, the Wasp had the both the ugly haircut and costume at the time.
At this time, I already started to read the X-Men on a regular basis and then jumped to read this series. I haven't re-read this series in over a decade (I am waiting for my the Omnibus), but if I recall, I didn't think Jim Shooter had a good handle on the X-Men at all in the series. As you guys mentioned, the Wolverine in Secret Wars was not in sync with the Wolverine appearing in Uncanny at the time. I read these comics as they were coming out and I noticed it even back then. Since the X-men were my favorite Marvel characters at the time, that mis-characterization had a negative impact of my enjoyment of the series. I still loved the series, but it could have been better if Shooter wrote the X-men better.
As for Iron Man's strength, back in the old days, I thought Iron Man and Hulk would fight all the time. This was before the Hulk became the "Super" Hulk he is today. So that is why it reads very wrong today.
Hassan
#18
Posted 08 December 2008 - 12:05 AM
Purple and Green. What's not to love? And Kang gets robbed in this series in later issues. Doom is second rate to all things Kang.
- "Greetings Avengers. Surrender".
#19
Posted 09 December 2008 - 07:39 PM
Professor Xavier was cloned a new healthy body however he had unexplainable excruitiating pain when he tried standing. I think it was something with his mind that prevented him from walking for a while. He eventually overcame this hurdle which is when he was able to walk again.
#20
Posted 09 December 2008 - 09:04 PM
Can't wait for a New Teen Titans 1-50. Come on Peter. For the love of Peréz!

Help

















