The Comic Forums: Movie News: Terrence OUT, Cheadle IN - The Comic Forums

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Movie News: Terrence OUT, Cheadle IN As War Machine

#1 User is offline   Coma Robot 

  • Excelsior
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,486
  • Joined: 16-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 05:14 AM

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/conten...f5b0b84b924a87b

Im indifferent...Both are killer actors, Howard must be kicking himself !
0

#2 User is offline   The Raph Radia 

  • The Double - R Writing Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 9,768
  • Joined: 19-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 06:07 AM

WHAT????

I mean I don't mind Cheadle, but I like consistancy!!!
0

#3 User is offline   Malpractice 

  • Excelsior
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,001
  • Joined: 25-February 07

Posted 14 October 2008 - 06:30 AM

Both are great actors, but i don't see why either is slumming it in this movie.
Posted Image
blog / facebook / twitter / last.fm

Listen to the 'MATINEE IDLES' podcast

Comics were definitely happier, breezier and more confident in their own strengths before Hollywood and the Internet turned the business of writing superhero stories into the production of low budget storyboards or, worse, into conformist, fruitless attempts to impress or entertain a small group of people who appear to hate comics and their creators. - Grant Morrison
0

#4 User is offline   TitansTogether 

  • Excelsior
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,337
  • Joined: 16-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 07:20 AM

Terrence Howard was awesome!! This is just a stupid move. Did they really think he was asking too much or something?
0

#5 User is offline   Devyn Rodriguez 

  • Excelsior
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,799
  • Joined: 02-September 08

Posted 14 October 2008 - 07:40 AM

What? Didn't they lock him up in a multi movie deal?

This maybe unwatchable for me.... Cry.
0

#6 User is offline   jaytomio 

  • Excelsior
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,552
  • Joined: 11-April 07

Posted 14 October 2008 - 07:42 AM

No drop-off here, as mentioned above both are able to be great actors given script/direction. Cheadle has shown a tendency to show up in movies and roles one wouldn't expect and always tends to class any movie up with being out of place in the film (that may need classing up).
0

#7

  • Group: Guests

Posted 14 October 2008 - 08:56 AM

I like Cheadle but he seems a bit too old.
0

#8 User is offline   jacobi 

  • Black Lantern
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,038
  • Joined: 17-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 09:00 AM

I'm not that big of a Howard fan, but he was good in Iron Man, if not a bit too swishy. Cheadle is that dude though, so I'm all for the change.
0

#9 User is offline   Trusty Mutsi 

  • Black Lantern
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,220
  • Joined: 19-April 07

Posted 14 October 2008 - 11:00 AM

I liked Howard in the movie, but his voice never seemed right. I always imagined Rhodes as having a deep voice.
0

#10 User is offline   matchkitjohn 

  • Black Lantern
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,359
  • Joined: 22-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 11:12 AM

Its not a downgrade but I like consistency like Wraith. At least for two movies. I wonder what was the salary gap was.

This post has been edited by matchkitjohn: 14 October 2008 - 11:17 AM

0

#11 User is offline   Gargoyle 

  • CGS Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 10,069
  • Joined: 17-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 11:12 AM

As long as he isn't doing his cockney accent we should be ok although isn't he considerably older than Howard?

Anyway it's a bloody shame, I wonder how locked in this is.
0

#12 User is offline   matchkitjohn 

  • Black Lantern
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,359
  • Joined: 22-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 11:16 AM

QUOTE (Gargoyle @ Oct 14 2008, 07:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As long as he isn't doing his cockney accent we should be ok although isn't he considerably older than Howard?

Anyway it's a bloody shame, I wonder how locked in this is.


Cheadle is 44 and Howard is 39 per IMDB.
0

#13 User is offline   jkkeller914 

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 649
  • Joined: 27-June 08

Posted 14 October 2008 - 11:23 AM

QUOTE (matchkitjohn @ Oct 14 2008, 06:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Cheadle is 44 and Howard is 39 per IMDB.


Robert Downey Jr. is 43. By that rationale, wouldn't he be too old to play Iron Man? Cheadle and Howard are both phenomenal actors, as is Downey. I say, it's a wash, as to who will play Jim Rhodes.
0

#14 User is offline   ljacone 

  • Praise The Profit
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,624
  • Joined: 16-June 08

Posted 14 October 2008 - 11:45 AM

Bleah. I have never bought into the Don Cheadle-hype. I really liked Terrence Howard as Rhodey and was looking forward to seeing him get his Variable Threat Response on in the sequel.
0

#15 User is offline   optimusblack2007 

  • OptimusBlack
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,341
  • Joined: 15-November 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 12:14 PM

I'm sold either way. Mr. Howard & Mr. Cheadle are two of my favorite actors, so it's a win-win for me.

Although, I'm intrigued by Marvel Films contract negotiations. Marvel Films almost lost director Jon Favreau due to their penny-pinching efforts and scheduling, and I'm wondering if the suits are being a little too greedy or if Mr. Howard was asking for a little too much.

This post has been edited by optimusblack2007: 14 October 2008 - 12:15 PM

0

#16 User is offline   Just Bill 

  • I've reversed the polarity of the neutron-flow.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 9,125
  • Joined: 16-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 12:29 PM

I thought Howard was perfect and was looking forward to seeing him get armored up. This kinda blows, although Cheadle is pretty bad ass in terms of acting chops. So it sucks, but I can think of worse news for the franchise.
0

#17 User is offline   Wood 

  • I eat OHOTMU for breakfast
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9,489
  • Joined: 17-January 07

Posted 14 October 2008 - 12:40 PM

QUOTE (optimusblack2007 @ Oct 14 2008, 08:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm sold either way. Mr. Howard & Mr. Cheadle are two of my favorite actors, so it's a win-win for me.

Although, I'm intrigued by Marvel Films contract negotiations. Marvel Films almost lost director Jon Favreau due to their penny-pinching efforts and scheduling, and I'm wondering if the suits are being a little too greedy or if Mr. Howard was asking for a little too much.


It's not a case of being greedy. It's a case of trying desperately not to make the same financial mistakes that most movie studios do. Making big budget studio films is a horrendously inefficient and, most times, the net profit margins are minimal.
0

#18 User is offline   optimusblack2007 

  • OptimusBlack
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,341
  • Joined: 15-November 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 12:46 PM

QUOTE (Wood @ Oct 14 2008, 08:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's not a case of being greedy. It's a case of trying desperately not to make the same financial mistakes that most movie studios do. Making big budget studio films is a horrendously inefficient and, most times, the net profit margins are minimal.

I understand, but Iron Man far exceeded everybody's expectations. I would see that as a reason why Mr. Howard would ask for a little more.

But we don't know what he asked for and what Marvel was willing to give. At least they found a solid replacement.
0

#19 User is offline   edit_this 

  • No, you can't have my avatar.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 4,707
  • Joined: 16-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 12:46 PM

Yeah, this sucks, if only for the scene in which Rhodey dons the War Machine armor for the first time. This makes Howard's "Next time, baby" comment in the first movie not as cool.
Posted Image

Brad's Posted Image
HHW's Posted Image
0

#20 User is offline   Paul 

  • White Lantern
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 4,227
  • Joined: 16-October 06

Posted 14 October 2008 - 12:51 PM

Since he's likely to spend half the movie in armour, does it really matter?

As long as they're still looking at putting strong actors in these movies, I'm on board. As long as someone addresses him as Rhodey at some point, we've got all the setup we need.
***********************
Paul French
http://www.paulfrench.ca
@tunegeek
Listen to me here:
Legion of Substitute Podcasters
Poptopia Podcast
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users